|
|
|
March 24
|
Utrecht, Room K11 (basement)
| |
11:30-12:30, 13:30-14:30
|
E. Friedman (U. of Chile), Lehmer's Conjecture and
Relative Regulators
Abstract.
Smyth showed in 1971 that if a polynomial (assumed monic,
irreducible, with integer coefficients and of degree at least 2) is
not palindromic, then its roots cannot be too close to the unit
circle, in a certain precise sense. (A polynomial is palindromic if
the sequence of coefficients reads the same backwards or forwards.)
Lehmer's conjecture states that Smyth's conclusion should hold even
for palindromic polynomials, as long as they are not cyclotomic. The
simplest open case of Lehmer's conjecture is that of Salem numbers,
i.e. of a palindromic polynomial having only one root outside the
unit circle. Such a root α is called a Salem number. It is an
algebraic unit which generates a number field
L=Q(α), endowed with a subfield
K=Q(α+α-1) with
[L:K]=2 and NormL/K(α)=1.
Thus α is a ``relative unit'' of the extension
L/K. I will describe regulators of relative units
and a conjectural lower bound for them which would imply the Salem
number case of Lehmer's conjecture. I will sketch a proof of this
conjecture in the high-rank case. Unfortunately the Salem number case
is the rank-one case. I will end by presenting a formula which might
pave the way for a proof of the low-rank case. This is joint work
with N.-P. Skoruppa, published some 6 years ago, but still unfinished
in the low-rank case.
| |
14:45-15:30, 15:45-16:30
|
F. Beukers (Utrecht), Lower bounds for heights of algebraic
points
Abstract.
We consider the algebraic points on an algebraic variety defined
over the algebraic closure of Q and their absolute normalised logarithmic
heights. In many cases it turns out that one can give uniform
non-trivial
lower bounds for these heights. We start with a remarkable
elementary result by Zhang-Zagier and then proceed to discuss
some wide generalisations, with applications to diophantine equations.
|
|
|
|